Toxic Chemicals, Micro Plastics, Ocean Acidification and Climate Change

Time is running out, priority chemical, ocean acidification induced pollution will cause a trophic cascade collapse of the ecosystem in 25 to 40 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When we are gone from the Oceans
 
Were taking 2 billion of you with us..... !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 1000 tonnes of TBT would kill all life in the Oceans, yet we make more than 30,000 tonnes a year and it cant be recycled

 

The world manufactures 30,000 tonnes a year of organic tin as a plasticiser used in PVC,  as a biocide in cooling towers, as a catalyst in organic chemistry, it is still even used as antifouling paint on the hull of container ships. If 1000 tonnes were to dissolve into the oceans all at the one time, it will kill all marine life...everywhere. Plastic is building up in ocean sediment, micro-plastics and nanoplastics are adsorbed by marine life, it all ends up back in the food chain and in people.  What Goes Around Comes Around, all marine life and people, now contain nano plastic and priority chemicals including organic tin. We have basically destroyed our envirtonment, the chemical bomb has exploded, but nobody is paying attetion, the focus has been on CO2 emmissions.

Toxic priority chemicals adsorbed onto hydrophobic nano particles such as plastic, from washing your fleece and zeolites used in washing up detergents, concentrate the priority chemicals and inject them into bacteria, algae and plankton.  We depend upon the oceanic food chain for our very survival, it is being destroyed and few people actually know it is happening.  We have around 25 years before a cascade failure, and if we lose the marine ecosystem, the terrestrial system will follow.

The fate of the Oceans

  • The concentration of priority chemicals such as PCBs and PBDE from fire retardants in carpets, cloths and foam products are now off-the-scale in most marine mammals.
  • 90% of all cancers suffered by people are known to be of environmental origin, caused by priority chemicals
  • Life expectancy is now dropping, people are starting to die younger, not live longer and again this is due to pollution in water, air & food
  • Male fertility has dropped by 50% in Europe due to hormones and endocrine disrupters.
  • Marine mammals as well as humans as a biological defence mechanism, dump toxins into the foetus and in milk. The toxins / priority chemicals are then implicated in causing neurological disorders and are cancer precursors
  • We are not only destroying the ecosystem; we are killing ourselves
  • All life on Earth depends upon the Oceans, is it too late to fix ?

    80% of the worlds oxygen is produced in the oceans by microscopic plants, and 30% of the carbon dioxide is fixed by organisms smaller than 1mm.  We know that atmospheric oxygen levels are dropping and carbon dioxide concentrations are increasing.

    Most life on earth lives in the oceans, and is too small to seen by eye, according to NASA, the microscopic life forms are dying off at a rate of 1% every year.  This means that 0.8% off all life on the planet is dying every year. Research from Universities such as Dalhousie in Nova Scotia, published in Nature, report that more than 40% of all microscopic life has died since the 1950s, the start of the chemical revolution as opposed to the industrial revolution.  As a consequence, the oceans are losing their ability to sequester carbon dioxide which means that carbon dioxide concentrations are increasing, making the oceans more acidic.  

    The pH (acidity) has dropped from 8.26 to 8.06 over the last 50 years. Over the next 25 to 40 years it will drop to pH7.9, at which point there will be a cascade failure of the marine ecosystem, and we lose all the teleost fish, whales, seals, birds and food supply for 2 billion people.

    Increasing temperatures and carbon dioxide, as well as all the nutrients from pollution should increase primary productivity, yet we are see a drop of 1% every year.  This situation is not sustainable, but why is it happening?  we know that it is certainly not climate change. 

    Priority chemical pollution in combination with hydrophobic micro and nano particles is the explanation. Reducing CO2 emissions is not going to have any impact, we need to also reduce and eliminate priority chemicals such as PCBs, PBDE, mercury and organic tins.


    • Toxic Chemicals, Micro Plastics, Ocean Acidification and Climate Change

      Video presentation of the problem and the solution

       

      www.GoesFoundation.com

      We are marine biologists dedicated to helping protect the Oceans because if we lose the Oceans the terrestrial ecosystem will also collapse. We are very close to allowing this to happen.

      Europe manufactures 200,000 tonnes a year of toxic priority chemicals that are deemed too toxic to expose to humans or to enter the environment. Yet many thousands of tonnes are discharged into rivers and the seas, and it is not even monitored. Around the world the input of these chemicals is huge. We depend up the oceans for to to 90% of our oxygen and CO2 fixation, yet we may have lost 40% of the ability of the oceans to perform this task since the 1950’s and the chemical revolution. NASA reports that we are now losing 1% of ocean life every year!

      It is unbelievable that the problems have been almost completely ignored. However when you project the rate of change of Ocean pH using data from the IPCC, we will achieve a pH of 7.9 to 7.95 over the next 25 to 50 years. There will the be a trophic cascade failure of the marine ecosystem and we lose all fish, whales, seals, seabirds and the food supply for over 1.5 billion people and climate change will accelerate at 5 times the rate. This is not speculation, it is going to happen unless we act now to curb not only the burning of fossil fuels but the discharge or toxic chemicals.

      Help us raise the debate on the subject conduct research and advise governments.

      Sign the petition

      The Goes Foundation is a not for profit organisation set up to raise awareness about the damage inflicted on the Oceans by priority chemicals, plastics and toxic substances

      Goes Foundation, Edinburgh, Tel +44 (0)7748701275, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

    • The facts

      The concentration of chemicals such as PCB's are over 1 ng/l, even in Antarctica, and are impacting on the health and survival of whales, seals, fish and plankton. The chemicals are adsobed on to hydrophobic surfaces such as microbe cell walls and are then injested. Priority substances are also absorbed by micro-plastics which are then consumbed by invertebrates and fish. In effect there is no safe level, even if the priority substances are below detection level in solution, it will be concentrated on particles and by a process of chain amplification it will reach high concentrations in fish, as well as marine mammals and birds.

      Priority chemicals such as PCB's and fire retardants including PBDE impact on primary productivity (plankton growth) and have reduced the ability of the oceans to absorb CO2 by 40% since the 1950's. It is not the industrial revolution, but the chemical revolution that is having the greatest impact.

      The pH of the Oceans continues to decline and when it reaches pH7.9 in 25 to 50 years there will be a cascade destabilization of the marine ecosystem which will be followed by the terrestrial ecosystem. The burning of fossil fuels only accounts for 3% of the total CO2 emissions (from IPCC). We know the Oceans absorb between 50% to 80% for the planets CO2, yet we may have lost up to 40% of the capacity to remove CO2. Even if it is just 5% it would still explain the increasing CO2 concentrations.

      Serious consequence if there is no action

      We have very little data on the concentration and distribution of priority chemicals in the oceans. We don't know the full impact of these chemicals on primary productivity, however even if it is only 5% it is hugely significant. The solution Priority chemicals are derived from industrial and domestic pollution from all countries, we need to stop the use of the most toxic bioactive chemicals If we can not eliminate the use of the chemicals, the technology required to remove them from waste water needs to be developed. From a meeting at the Royal Society for Chemistry on 12th November 2014 in London on Priority Chemicals it was revealed the the source of the toxic chemicals in Europe, is not industry but domestic sources. In the developing countries it is more likely to be industry.

      Over 90% of the surface fresh water (rivers & lakes) and 75% of ground-water in China, Bangladesh, India is grossly contaminated. The chemicals are impacting on industrial productivity and the health and wellbeing of everyone. Even if the elimination of priority chemicals is not the complete solution to climate change, it will protect drinking water resource, the life in the oceans and stability of the ecosystem. If we lose the marine ecosystem, the terrestrial system cannot be sustained.

      Benefits for society and our environment

      Primary productivity account for 98% of all biomass in the oceans, so the microbes and plankton in the oceans are the drivers of the ecosystem. The organisms can double in biomass every few minutes to days, so if we remove the priority chemicals the marine ecosystem should recover over a period of a few years. If we do not remove the priority chemicals, the marine ecosystem will collapse and climate change will be the least of our problems.

      The good news is that we can fix the ecosystem if we all work together to eliminate the use of toxic chemicals.

      1. Industry must stop supplying the public with goods that contain toxic priority chemicals, this is were most of the chemicals are coming from in the developed world, so it is our responsibility.

      2. We need to deal with waste such as consumer electronics and prevent their toxic components entering the environment, we must stop exporting the problem to China and India. Technology needs to be developed to recycle and reuse the waste and turn it back into valuable components for a circular economy.

      3. If we can not prevent the chemicals entering the environment we must develop the geology to remove the chemicals from rivers and ground water This will not only help protect the health and wellbeing of billions of people and provide water and food security, it is also the final barrier to protect the oceans and the heath and well being of the entire ecosystem

      Nature can adapt to organic waste such as ammonium, nitrates, urea and even green house gases including carbon dioxide and methane, they are very important but not the primary problem. Nature simply can not adapt to man made chemicals such as PCBs and fire retardants including PBDE or mercury, if we don't deal with this problem over the next 25 years, we are basically stuffed.

      Any organizations wishing to get involved with GOES (Global Oceanic Environmental Survey) contact

      Dr.Howard Dryden

    • Source of priority substances in Developed countries is mainly from domestic sources.

      Human health

      Priority substances are toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic and are implicated in many different disease and syndromes relating from AD (attention deficient syndrome) in children to potentially autoimmune disorders and neurological disorders. These are just some of the impacts on human health, you then have the impact they have on the environment from domestic products such as;

      • Cleaning products
      • Domestic care products
      • Cosmetics
      • Micro-fibres in cloths
      • Fire retardants in cloths and furniture
      • Electrical appliances, phones and computers

      Environmental health

      Everything that is used will eventually end up back in the environment and the oceans. By way of example 1 drop of a methyl mercury dropped into the source of rivers such as the Thames or the Rhine will end up in a concentration that will be toxic at the mouth of either river. The quantities of the chemicals involved are almost below detection level. Even if the chemicals can not be measured, it will still be toxic because plankton and animals concentrate the chemicals in their body through a process of chain amplification. By ay of example if you eat more that two oily fish such as mackerel from the North Sea every week, you will suffer from PCB and dioxin poisoning.

      The Oceans are under serious threat and unless we can reverse the trend there will be a cascade desalination of the marine ecosystem. We will lose all fish, whales, seals, birds polar bears as well as the food supply for over 1.5 billion people. We all have a responsibility to fix the problem.

      What can we do ?

      The main source of priority chemicals in Europe and North America is everyone that we uses cosmetics, most cleaning products, dishwashing tablets, if you wear a fleece or sit on a chair with fire retardants such as PBDE. In order to make an informed choice, this section of the website will be developed as a register of products of concern and products that are acceptable.

      The choice of acceptable products is currently very small, industry and companies must therefore develop a range of new products or technology to recycle and reuse waste products in a Circular Economy that does not allow such toxic substances to be produced.

    • List of 33 priority substances

      The following 33 substances and chemical compounds are included in the list of priority substances established by the European Union. Some of these priority substances are also priority hazardous substances.

      List of 20 priority substances

      The following 20 substances are priority substances, but not priority hazardous substances

      List of 13 priority hazardous substances

      The following 13 substances are priority substances and priority hazardous substances:

      Substances subject to review for possible identification as priority substances or priority hazardous substances

      The following substances and chemical compounds are included in the listof substances, established by the European Union, for which it should be reviewed whether they should be included in the list of priority substances or priority hazardous substances:

       

       

       

    • GOES... Global oceanic survey to measure measure toxic priority chemicals derived from industry entering the oceans. We wish to raise awareness because if the marine ecosystem fails the terrestrial ecosystem can not be sustained.We have between 25 and 50 years before the potential destabilization of the marine ecosystem and this will be far worse than the effect of climate change. The impending disaster can still be reversed if we prevent industrial pollution of our rivers and oceans.

      The GOES platform with Clipper provides the mechanism to conduct the research and a world stage of 3 billion to disseminate the message.

      If we lose the marine ecosystem, the terrestrial system cannot be sustained.


      Any organizations wishing to get involved with GOES (Global Oceanic Environmental Survey) starting October 2014, contact Dr.Howard Dryden at Dryden Aqua, Edinburgh Scotland Clipper GOES

    • GOES Global Oceanic Environmental Survey

      PROJECT BRIEF: The question ?

      Is aquatic environmental pollution from priority substances impacting on marine species diversity and primary productivity and is it implicated in ocean acidification and climate change.

      The GOES Project aims to bring about change;

      1. The elimiantion of priority substances in domestic / consumer products

      2. The promotion of technologis to recycle, recover, reuse and remanufacture as part of the circular economy

      3. If we can not prevent the manufacture or reuse of priority substances then we must remove the substances from drinking water, waste water and the environment.

      The GOES Project, with an international technical team overseeing and directing, will:

      The Problem:

      Many indicators tell us our oceans are changing for the worse. Some of these changes are visible and are getting our attention – over fishing, marine litter, and reduction/loss of of marine biodiversity. We have already lost over 90% of all large fish, tuna and sharks as well as coral reefs around th world. However, it is the presence and impact of pollution from Priority Substances (those chemicals most toxic to humans, aquatic life and other organisms) on which we have little or no data because it’s been too difficult to collect the data, but they may very well have a more negative impact than we realize. We know that the oceans are changing fast and the use of toxic chemicals in our homes, businesses and industry, along with our use of fossil fuels, have been highlighted as possible reasons for this change in biodiversity. We also know that if we lose the marine ecosystem, the loss of the terrestrial system will follow. Data from academic institutions and the aquaria industry from across the globe, when pieced together, form a very worrying picture:

      • The burning of fossil fuels only accounts for only 3% of the CO2 entering the atmosphere (IPCC 2013 26)
      • 50% to 80% of atmospheric CO2 is adsorbed by the oceans
      • Since 1950, the oceanic productivity (plankton/marine algae and bacteria) may have reduced by up to 40% (Boyce et al., 2010 3). This means CO2 adsorption by the oceans has also dropped by up to 40%,(hugely significant even at 5%)
      • The reduction in productivity may be due to priority chemicals as opposed to an increase in temperature, PCB concentrations in Antarctica are over 1 ng/l (Joiris, C.R et al 11). However even if they were below detection level, the chemicals will be selectively absorbed by microbes and marine plastics to toxic levels. There is no safe concentration of a prtiority substance.
      • It follows that this reduction in productivity will result in higher concentration of CO2 because it is not being fixed, and in turn, ocean acidification will then accelerate.
      • Aquaria are mini oceanic ecosystems and they fail due to pH decline –this maps across to the IPCC extrapolation as follows: Oceanic pH decline, will reach pH7.95 in just 25 years, at which point there may be a cascade destabilization of the ecosystem. (IPCC 201326)
      • 90% of large fish have already been lost through over fishing, the reminder may not survive acidification.
      • Silica structured diatoms will take over from carbonate based algae e.g coccolithophores, ( BIOS) which are currently responsible for 25% of all CO2 fixation. Once this process initiates it cannot be reversed. However we still have a few years to reverse the trend, but we need start now.

      The above bullet points are a few pieces of the jigsaw that, when brought together, highlight why we need to be doing more to measure priority substances. We just do not have enough data on their impact on the marine ecosystem to convince the world’s governments, industry and society to make the necessary urgent change.

      We do not currently know the full impact priority chemicals have on the marine environment. In addition, there are data that makes us ask the questions about the possible strong link between marine biodiversity and climate change – with more evidence, this may be a mechanism of climate change about which we can also take corrective action.

      The burning of fossil fuels will continue to rise, and the impact on climate change is inevitable, however the oceans are our buffer and ally. If we reduce or prevent priority chemical pollution there may be scope for the oceans to recover, for primary productivity to increase to a point where it could safely absorb more carbon dioxide again and make a significant contribution to our mitigation efforts to combat climate change.

      The Vision

      We do know that we can’t control what we don’t measure. GOES aims to address the lack of data and help get a handle on this issue.

      GOES is also win-win project… We get data to inform AND we work to stop priority chemicals getting in to our oceans and into our food chain. By demonstrating the level of priority chemicals in the ocean, this helps to signpost to freshwater aquatic environmental pollution, drinking water as well as food security.

      There is no excuse for non action….. getting those priority chemicals out of the ecosystem might just lift the ‘foot off the brake’ on primary productivity and give the marine ecosystem a chance to recover and, we may even find this will help reverse some of the effects of climate change. No matter what, if the GOES Project can reduce toxicity and increase the ocean’s ability to absorb CO2 –it can only be good.

      The GOES objectives are:

      OBJECTIVE 1:

      Priority substances are a concern for the environment nationally and internationally with over 100 or so listed in Annex X of the European Union’s Water Framework Directive. It is expected that this list will grow to close to 500 by 2020. There is a pressing need to identify new treatments that will remove priority substances economically and preferably with low energy consumption and chemical consumption. The sampling regime is currently being developed with experts involved in environmental regulation, water chemistry and environmental and marine engineering.

      Marine biology institutes and leading aquaria are also being consulted to ensure that GOES results in collecting robust data sets which can be used and mashed with out models to help inform the science and develop our understanding to inform the management of our oceans.

       

      OBJECTIVE 2:

      To contribute to and raise the debate on the global action required to address the declining health of our oceans and the role that priority substances may be playing not only to this decline, but their potential impact on climate change.

       

      The GOES Leadership & Communication Team

      Dr Howard Dryden, a Scottish marine biologist, who has dedicated his life to minimizing the use of chemicals to treat water across the world. GOES is the start of a new journey in helping to raise the consciousness of the wider public about priority substances.

      To direct and steer an International Advisory Council, and a Scientific Board. Establishing a GOES Foundation for ongoing fundraising and awareness raising purposes is currently being explored to ensure that GOES has a sustained impact. The GOES Foundation will be based in Edinburgh, Scotland.

       

    • Dr Dryden commenting on the importance of Phil’s work on the environment said: “In the climate change debate, the fundamental of us having healthy oceans gets underplayed. Not only have we harvested over 90% of the fish, littered our oceans with plastics, but also we’ve probably poisoned 40% of all the plankton, which are in effect the lungs of the planet. Not only do they produce most of the oxygen that we breathe but are responsible for sequestering anthropogenic CO2 and have been keeping the Earth’s climate in balance. But there is a tipping point coming.

      During the last 60 years, we’ve been inadvertently putting toxic chemicals from our household cleaners, shower gels, bubble bath and pharmaceuticals down the drain. The sad fact is that most wastewater treatment systems don’t remove the chemicals so they end up in rivers and, ultimately our oceans. NASA reported recently that their research showed we are losing plankton from our oceans at an alarming rate of 1% every year in the Northern hemisphere. What this means is that carbon dioxide levels are raising faster and, in 25 to 40 years, the pH will drop from 8.06 to 7.9, there will be a tropic collapse of the ocean ecosystem and we lose all fish, seals, birds and whales.

      The GOES Foundation with Phil Sharp’s Vendee Globe Energy Challenge aims to collect and develop the evidence to persuade policy makers to take action and get these pollutants out of the environment as quickly as possible. Phil will collect plankton samples for analysis and we will use our findings to educate and inform consumers, industry and policy makers and Governments of the issues and implications of these toxic substances making there way from our homes and businesses to our oceans.

      If we stop their discharge, develop technology to remove them from our waste water, we will, in turn, protect and restore our ocean ecosystems, reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide and it might even help reverse climate change”.

    Coral bleaching may not be due to climate change

    Coral are a symbiotic organism between a filter feeding animal and an algae. We know that priority chemicals will be adsorbed onto hydrophobic particles such as plastic, if therefore follows that corals will likely have a higher concentration of priority chemicals.

    Priority chemicals will therefore be concentration in the coral. Water temperature will of course cause also cause bleaching, but a high temperature is likely to make the priority chemicals more toxic. The question now is which parameter is the most important. www.GoesFoundation.com states that the priority chemicals are more relevant.

    recent reference

    News items archive

    'Extraordinary' levels of pollutants found in 10km deep Mariana trench

    Newcastle University marine science department have discovered “extraordinary” levels of toxic pollution in the most remote and inaccessible place on the planet – the 10km deep Mariana trench in the Pacific Ocean.

    Small crustaceans that live in the pitch-black waters of the trench, captured by a robotic submarine, were contaminated with 50 times more toxic chemicals than crabs that survive in heavily polluted rivers in China.

    “We still think of the deep ocean as being this remote and pristine realm, safe from human impact, but our research shows that, sadly, this could not be further from the truth,” said Alan Jamieson of Newcastle University in the UK, who led the research.

    “The fact that we found such extraordinary levels of these pollutants really brings home the long-term, devastating impact that mankind is having on the planet,” he said.

    Jamieson’s team identified two key types of severely toxic industrial chemicals that were banned in the late 1970s, but do not break down in the environment, known as persistent organic pollutants (POPs). These chemicals have previously been found at high levels in Inuit people in the Canadian Arctic and in killer whales and dolphins in western Europe.

    The research, published in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution, suggests that the POPs infiltrate the deepest parts of the oceans as dead animals and particles of plastic fall downwards. POPs accumulate in fat and are therefore concentrated in creatures up the food chain. They are also water-repellent and so stick to plastic waste.